Welcome to Moms4Mitt.com

A unique Mitt Romney for President website. Here on M4M you can follow and share day to day progress on Mitt Romney's run for the White House as well as get to know other MOMS who support Mitt Romney! By sharing this unique network of Mothers, we feel that we will make a major impact on Mitt's campaign - right from our own homes! Thanks so much for joining us !

Archive for November, 2006

Nov
28

The Big Dig

Posted by: Heather | Comments (0)
The Big Dig

Massachusetts Gov Mitt Romney is taking full responsibility for getting the nation’s largest construction project back from crisis. Can we base his worthiness to be President on his successes/failures here? I say YES - in addtition to his other achievements. The Big Dig is a MASSIVE undertaking filled with beurocracy, diplomacy and strength of character. But I am curious to know what you all think!

Here is a link to the first press conference he held to announce his Administration’s intentions and it is most impressive! Mitt Romney has ultimate control and command and he is very thoughtful and thourough. Scroll down to WHDH-TV Video and the 7/13 press conference to hear all about the Big Dig and watch Gov Romney excercise his Executive Authority - it’s really incredible to watch!

http://www3.whdh.com/news/articles/special_edition/BO22490/

Categories : Big Dig
Comments (0)
Nov
28

Beyond Same Sex Marriage

Posted by: Heather | Comments (0)
Beyond Same-Sex Marriage
Beyond Same-Sex Marriage
Can Mitt Romney spur a broader debate?

BY BRENDAN MINITER
Tuesday, November 28, 2006    The Wall Street Journal
Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is taking the battle over same-sex marriage to a new level by taking it back to the very court that made this mess: the state’s Supreme Judicial Court. On Friday Mr. Romney–perhaps laying the groundwork for a presidential run–filed a lawsuit against his state Legislature for failing to vote on whether to put a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage on the ballot. He says the Legislature was required to do just that after a record number of residents (170,000) signed petitions demanding a popular vote.

Mr. Romney’s case isn’t expected go very far. Aside from the obvious separation-of-powers problem, Mr. Romney is asking the same court that imposed same-sex marriage three years ago to parse his constitutional logic. Like a second marriage, expecting the court to allow a rebuke of its earlier decision is a triumph of hope over experience.

But Mr. Romney’s case does have one salutary effect. He filed suit against the Legislature not for failing to endorse a ban on same-sex marriage, but for using a series of procedural moves to avoid voting on the issue and thereby keeping it off the ballot. Mr. Romney’s lawsuit is, therefore, an attempt to use the state’s high court for what it has heretofore resisted being: A bulwark for democracy.

Because Massachusetts’ Constitution requires votes in favor of an amendment from only one-fourth of the Legislature in two successive terms to get it on the ballot, the governor would likely win the fight if only the Democratic leaders of the Legislature would allow a vote. But the real target here isn’t the judiciary or even the Legislature. Mr. Romney filed his case in an attempted to push the debate over marriage back into the court of public opinion. And he’s thinking well beyond the confines of Massachusetts–where voters are eager for an opportunity to weigh in on the issue–and into Republican presidential primaries, where he aspires to be the candidate with the strongest social conservative credentials.
It is here that Mr. Romney performs a public service. Dozens of states have already enacted their own constitutional amendments banning gay marriage. But as these amendments have passed with overwhelming margins in even liberal states (and helped turn out Republican voters in 2004), the debate over the merits of traditional marriage has largely died down. Passing the marriage amendments have been exercises in the expression of the popular will, without also serving as an opportunity to reach a consensus on why marriage as an institution is worth protecting.

Although advocates of same-sex marriage will deny there is any connection to extending the institution to gay couples, a recent report released by the National Center for Health Statistics reveals why this debate is worth having now. The study found that although teen pregnancy rates are dropping, the number of out-of-wedlock births in America has been steadily rising since the 1990s. It seems women in their 20s and 30s are having children without getting married first. Last year the proportion of births that are illegitimate reached an all time high of 37%, or 1.5 million children.

The debate on how to address this growing social problem will likely only take place in a presidential race and only if at least one candidate vying for the Oval Office is willing to cogently make the case for marriage, rather than push the issue off to the side by calling for a federal constitutional amendment.

Mr. Miniter is assistant editor of OpinionJournal.com. His column appears Tuesdays.

Categories : Marriage
Comments (0)
Nov
27

Searching for The Gipper

Posted by: Heather | Comments (0)
Searching For The Gipper

By Doug Patton
November 27, 2006

Is there another Ronald Reagan on the horizon for 2008, a leader who can rally the coalitions that gave Reagan an eight-year mandate? Let’s examine (in alphabetical order) some of the most frequently mentioned Republican presidential candidates. Just for fun, let’s create a one-to-ten “Gipper meter.” Ten would be a Republican leader of Reagan’s experience, stature, vision and charisma. One would be Lincoln Chaffee.

Sam Brownback — The young congressman from Kansas who replaced Bob Dole in the U.S. Senate has championed the cause of social conservatism in the upper body of the congress. This has made him a hero among so-called values voters, who find precious few senators from either party willing to fight for their issues. Compared with Reagan, Brownback would rate at least a seven or eight for ideology, but would only get a two or three for experience and charisma, thereby rendering him a mediocre five overall at best.

Bill Frist — The now-retired U.S. Senator from Tennessee has created about as much excitement as a potential presidential candidate as he did as senate majority leader. In other words, he is boring and has accomplished little. His rating on the Gipper meter: two.

Newt Gingrich — The former speaker of the house probably comes closer than anyone on the current scene to living up to the experience, stature and vision of Ronald Reagan, and what Newt lacks in charisma, he more than makes up for in knowledge and debate skills. I would give him an eight on the Gipper meter.

Rudy Giuliani — America’s mayor, as he was dubbed in the days following the 9/11 attacks, is greatly admired for his courage and leadership during that time, and as the man who cleaned up New York City. In stature and charisma, he rates a ten on the Gipper meter. For vision, he would get a five. Ideologically, especially on social issues, he is very liberal and therefore rates a zero in that area. His electability in a general election campaign is probably off the charts. In the primaries, however, he will never make the grade.

Chuck Hagel — The senior senator from Nebraska has so alienated his core constituents by imitating his hero, John McCain, that he probably could not get reelected to his current position, let alone win a Republican presidential primary. He thinks he is a Reagan conservative. Voters will let him know otherwise if he runs for president. He has charisma, and little else, except ego. I give him a one on the Gipper meter.

Mike Huckabee — The slimmed-down governor of Arkansas shares much of Reagan’s vision, as well as his values, but his charisma, experience and stature are lacking. Overall, a three on the meter.

Duncan Hunter — Announced his intention to run for president just before this year’s congressional election. As the representative from California’s 52nd Congressional District, Hunter has served in the House for 25 years, and is currently chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, thus giving him a high Gipper meter rating for experience. He is straight forward in expressing his conservative opinions, which are consistent with Reagan’s. Since few people know him, and since Americans have rarely ever elected a president straight out of the U.S. House of Representatives, Hunter is a long shot. Overall, I would give him a six.

John McCain — The architect of the incumbent protection act (laughingly called campaign finance reform) and of the senate’s gang of fourteen, which prevented the GOP leadership from exercising the constitutional option that would have shut down Democrat filibusters of judicial appointments, the senior senator from Arizona has spit in the eye of the Republican base just once too often. His political experience is strictly as a congressional compromiser. He is irritating and visionless. I would give McCain a two on the Gipper meter.

George Pataki — The governor of New York is Rudy Giuliani without the charisma. A zero on the meter.

Mitt Romney — The governor of Massachusetts is an unknown entity to most of the country. He has the charisma, the experience (Americans tend to elect governors to the presidency) and the vision. If he turns out to be as conservative as he wants us to believe he is, and if he can overcome the fact that he is a Mormon with evangelical voters, he could position himself as the next Ronald Reagan.

Come to think of it, there was only one Ronald Reagan, and we may never see his equal again.

Categories : Ronald Reagan
Comments (0)
Nov
26

Economic experts join Romney’s PAC

Posted by: Heather | Comments (0)
Economics Experts Join Romney’s PAC

By Dan Balz and Zachary A. Goldfarb
Wednesday, November 29, 2006; A10

He hasn’t even formed his presidential exploratory committee, but Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) has already signed up an economic brain trust to advise him, led by two former chairmen of President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers.

R. Glenn Hubbard, dean of the Columbia University Graduate School of Business, and N. Gregory Mankiw, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, have agreed to join Romney’s political action committee, committee spokesman Jared Young said yesterday. Hubbard and Mankiw will play key roles in the governor’s presidential campaign if he decides to run — a decision that is widely presumed.

A third member of Romney’s new economic team is Cesar Conda, who previously served as domestic policy adviser to Vice President Cheney.

Hubbard chaired Bush’s economic council from 2001 to 2003 and was succeeded by Mankiw, who served until 2005. Mankiw stirred up a controversy for the president in 2004 when he said the outsourcing of jobs was “probably a plus” for the U.S. economy in the long run. Many economists agreed with that view, but the comment revealed Mankiw’s lack of political instincts.

Hubbard said he was attracted to Romney as someone who believes in modest government and who tries to use government to solve problems in a businesslike way. “Given the problems we have, having somebody with a strong business background and a good worldview on the economy is a good thing,” he said.

Romney also announced this week that he has recruited Warren Tompkins, a veteran South Carolina Republican strategist who was a regional co-chairman of Bush’s reelection team, as an adviser for the Southeast.

Categories : Economy
Comments (0)
Nov
16

Gov Romney has the broadest appeal by far

Posted by: admin | Comments (0)

-

Romney

Huckabee

McCain

Giuliani

Thompson

Paul

Hunter

Total Delegates

42

21

19

1

6

2

1

% of Delegates

45.7%

22.8%

20.7%

1.1%

6.5%

2.2%

1.1%

Total Votes*

441602

206575

359882

48857

50847

84082

4542

% of Votes

36.9%

17.3%

30.1%

4.1%

4.3%

7.0%

0.4%

Ave. Place

1.5

2.75

2.75

5

4

4.5

6

Iowa

12

17

3

0

3

2

0

Wyoming

8

0

0

0

3

0

1

New Hampshire

4

1

7

0

0

0

0

Michigan

12

0

9

0

0

0

0

Other

6

3

0

1

0

0

0

Clearly, this shows that Gov Romney has widespread appeal. He garners the most total votes, percentage of votes and delegates. Also take note that, unlike any other candidate, the Governor has support in each state!

Categories : Polls
Comments (0)